Critiquing a journal article
Ogba, I. Dribe, C. ICT and effective supervision.
Critiquing journal articles
Oba: Ifevic Publishers Ltd. Ogunji, J. Meanwhile, Geiger M et al article introduced theory background more detailed, illustrated two components of expectancy theory, which are valence model and force model.
Thus, reader who with litter background knowledge could also understand this study well. Relatively, literature review was concise and only for the purpose of stating the uniqueness of this study. Both articles have moderate size of samples. Chen Y et al article received useable responded questionnaires out of business faculty members.
Style may not be consistently clear and effective. Shows careful and acceptable use of mechanics. A topic sentence.
Critiquing a journal article
A counterargument. Possible implications of the author's arguments. Identify the claims made in the article, and determine whether they are supported by convincing evidence and clearly expressed. Look for strengths and weaknesses in the content and style of the article, and provide supported evidence regarding ways in which the article could be improved. Not Helpful 1 Helpful What do you mean by "A critic does not have to be entirely positive or entirely negative"?
People tend to view the terms critic or criticism in a negative light, but in fact they refer in this context to a detailed, defensible analysis of the content and claims in another's work.
A good critique doesn't have to rip the article to shreds, nor does it need to hail it as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Rather, try to identify the various strengths and weaknesses in the piece under review. Not Helpful 4 Helpful Follow many of the same guidelines you would use critiquing a scholarly article. Ask yourself whether the learning objective clearly presents its main concepts and establishes their importance; whether the organization, structure, and content are sensible critiquing journal articles easy to follow; and how you would approach it differently and why.
Critiquing a journal article example
Not Helpful 1 Helpful 9. Make sure you've read the medical case report. Then, evaluate the information in the case report for accuracy, usefulness, etc. Not Helpful 2 Helpful 8. Ask yourself questions like: Is this map easy to follow?
Does it provide the necessary information? Are there any biases or limitations that become obvious when looking at this map?
Article Critique Guidelines
How does it compare to similar maps? How might I have created this map differently, and why? Not Helpful 2 Helpful 5. In the beginning of the intro, introduce the article, authors and end-text referencing.
Not Helpful 0 Helpful 0. Ask yourself these questions: Was this article helpful? Is it missing something? Was it structured and organized?
Is it of any use? Was it clear and understandable? Was it informative? How can it be improved? This will help you identify any weak points the article may have. Not Helpful 0 Helpful 2. Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered. By using this service, some information may be shared with YouTube. Report a problem. However, critiques are also sometimes assigned for research articles critiquing a journal article example.
Learn everything you need to need about custom. College essay. References, online marketplace for students. Sample literature review critique apa format. You will write a critique of an article you choose buy resume design the list at the end need this document.
Next, you should provide a. Apa in cite website citations apa essays how dissertations get marked compare and contrast essay on research and hate sociological need critique.
Results - are they presented in sufficient scope? Are they persuasive and reliable? Discussion - are results tested against hypothesis? Critiquing a journal article example other researchers say about this issue and their own results? Recommendation - are there any solutions or recommendations for future made? We offer quality drugs with no rx. Via a trip through the Guardian of Forever, from out of the dim past of the year near the end of the show's first run comes this article from.
New York: Dover, The articles. The Book Review or Article Critique. Critique of journal article.Blended learning according to Mizban and Roberts spans over face-to-face f2f and e-learning connecting them, combining learning on site with distant learning under the joint name of distributed learning. According to previous research and theory, they reported an overall positive attitude toward the adoption of e-learning among teaching staff, faculty members, students, administrators and tutors.
Waycott et al. This is coinciding with the present study to examine the impact of e-learning system on the teaching system. Subjects The population of interest defined. The sample for this research majored mainly on the tutors from faculty of college of Architecture, University of Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The data was obtained from the survey consists of two stages; pilot study and the main survey questionnaire distributed to the tutors on the faculty of college of Architecture. The findings of the study were generalized on tutors of University of Dammam. Therefore, it cannot be generalize to all university tutors. Moreover, the study focused on tutors on the faculty of college of architecture. Therefore it cannot be simply generalized for tutors with other domains.
Procedures Persuasive essay homework this study the tutors from the faculty of college of architecture were surveyed using a questionnaire that was developed for this study. The procedures described well enough to allow replication of the study. The respondents were made to indicate the degree of their agreement with the statements on the questionnaire about themselves.
They were required to select from a five-point scale which include a category of strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagree and strongly disagree and a structured questions which enabled the students to critiquing journal articles either yes or no options.
Instruments The instruments adequately described. The researcher used a four part questionnaire with twenty nine items. Analysis of the Data In this study, descriptive statistics used appropriate for summarizing the data.
An analysis was also taken of the mean that was measured using a five-point Likert scale. The statistics been interpreted appropriately for the level of measurement of the data. About This Article. Co-Authored By:. Co-authors: 8. Updated: October 30, Deutsch: Einen Zeitschriftenartikel rezensieren. Italiano: Scrivere una Recensione di un Articolo Accademico. Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 72, times.
A bereavement information leaflet was given to each surrogate decision maker. In this research, the independent variable can be the type of family conference received by the surrogates and the dependent variables were the level of stress, anxiety, and depression levels indicated in the day follow-up interview. Show More. Read More. Popular Essays. Open Document. The paper will apply a quantitative and a qualitative research article to the topic of sedation management to help validate meaning gleaned from two different research designs.
Critiquing a Qualitative Research Article Erinma Obioha South University Critiquing a qualitative research article Nurses are required to base their practice on evidence-based research. Therefore, it is essential for nurses to develop the skills necessary to analyze a research article. Critiquing a research article helps nurse judge the creditability of the information presented.
A clear, accurate and concise header forms a major component or guideline for analyzing a qualitative study. Armed with this information, the title of the study is clear, concise and arrests the attention of the reader.
From reading the title of the research article, it is easy to understand that the study focuses on looking at factors that contributes to aggressive behavior AB in the dementia patient population living in a nursing home. This involves deciding about content that you want to include, so it may take time, and feedback would help at this stage. When you sit down to write, what exactly are you doing:using writing to develop your ideas or writing to document your work?
Are you using your outline as an agenda for writing sections of your article? Define your writing task by thinking about verbs - they define purpose: to summarise, overview, critique, define, introduce, conclude etc. Even at the earliest stages, discuss your idea for a paper with four or five people, get feedback on your draft abstract.
It will only take them a couple of minutes to read it and respond. Do multiple revisions before you submit your article to the journal.
Quantitative Research Article Critique Essay example
Making your writing goals specific means defining the content, verb and word length for the section. This means not having a writing goal like, 'I plan to have this article written by the end of the year' but 'My next writing goal is to summarise and critique twelve articles for the literature review section in words on Tuesday between 9am and Some people see this as too mechanical for academic writing, but it is a way of forcing yourself to make decisions about content, sequence and proportion for your article.
While most people see writing as a solitary activity, communal writing - writing with others who are writing - can help to develop confidence, fluency and focus.
It can help you critiquing journal articles the discipline of regular writing. Doing your academic writing in groups or at writing retreats are ways of working on your own writing, but - if you unplug from email, internet and all other devices - also developing the concentration needed for regular, high-level academic writing. At some point - ideally at regular intervals - you can get a lot more done if you just focus on writing.
If this seems like common sense, it isn't common practice. Most people do several things at once, but this won't always work for regular journal article writing. At some point, it pays to privilege writing over all other tasks, for a defined period, such as 90 minutes, which is long enough to get something done on your paper, but not so long that it's impossible to find the time.
While you are deciding what you want to write about, an initial warm up that works is to write for five minutes, in sentences, in answer to the question: 'What writing for publication have you done [or the closest thing to it], and what do you want to do in the long, medium and short term?